The lengthy, unusual historical past of a quintessentially American theology.
Within the wake of Tropical Hurricane Harvey, which has resulted within the deaths of no less than 46 folks, few narratives have captured the general public creativeness — or anger — like that of Joel Osteen and his Lakewood Church, one of the vital biggest megachurches within the nation. Osteen’s seeming hesitation in opening the church as a refuge for evacuees provoked an intense social media backlash.
Lakewood’s representatives handle that the church was once opened as quickly because it was once protected and possible to take action. However whether or not the backlash was once based or now not, it displays the profoundly ambiguous emotions American citizens of various faiths have about wildly rich preachers like Osteen — whose internet value is estimated at over $50 million — and in regards to the “prosperity gospel” he preaches.
As Laura Turner notes in an very good piece for BuzzFeed, no theological custom is as rife for accusations of hypocrisy because the “prosperity gospel,” a distinctively American theological custom. Whilst it’s fashionable amongst many evangelical Protestants, it’s been condemned through many others. However to a lot of its critics, particularly for the reason that election of Donald Trump, this custom has come to constitute the worst of the conflation of American-style capitalism, faith, and Republican celebration politics.
The prosperity gospel is an umbrella time period for a bunch of concepts — fashionable amongst charismatic preachers within the evangelical custom — that equate Christian religion with subject matter, and in particular monetary, luck. It has a protracted historical past in American tradition, with figures like Osteen and Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker, glamorous, flashily-dressed televangelists whose Disneyland-meets-Bethlehem Christian theme park, Heritage USA, was once as soon as the third-most-visited website in The us.
A 2006 Occasions ballot discovered that 17 p.c of American Christians establish explicitly with the motion, whilst 31 p.c espouse the concept “in case you give your cash to God God will bless you with extra money.” A complete 61 p.c accept as true with the extra normal concept that “God desires folks to be wealthy.”
Its roots, despite the fact that, don’t simply lie in explicitly Christian custom. If truth be told, it’s imaginable to track the origins of the American prosperity gospel to the custom of New Concept, a nineteenth-century religious motion well liked by decidedly unorthodox thinkers like Ralph Waldo Emerson and William James. Practitioners of New Concept, now not all of whom recognized as Christian, in most cases held the divinity of the person human being and the concern of thoughts over topic. In different phrases, if it is advisable accurately channel your psychological power, it is advisable harness its subject matter effects. New Concept, sometimes called the “thoughts remedy,” took many bureaucracy: from hobby within the occult to splinter-Christian denominations like Christian Science to the improvement of the “speaking remedy” on the root of psychotherapy.
The upshot of New Concept, despite the fact that, was once the quintessentially American concept that the person was once chargeable for his or her personal happiness, well being, and scenario in existence, and that making use of psychological power in the precise path was once enough to remedy any ills.
Thus, New Concept philosopher Ralph Waldo Trine (to not be puzzled with Ralph Waldo Emerson) may just exhort his readers to “See your self in a wealthy situation. Verify that you are going to sooner than lengthy be in a wealthy situation.”
Along with influencing Christian actions just like the prosperity gospel, New Concept has additionally made its approach into many “secular” sides of American existence, together with the custom of positive-thinking self-help represented through books like The Secret, which was once written through an Australian however won recognition when promoted through Oprah.
A 2d strand within the building of the American prosperity gospel was once the valorization of the “Protestant paintings ethic.”
Written in 1905, Max Weber’s The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism traced what he noticed because the particularly Protestant way to hard work as integral to the improvement of capitalism and industrialization.
In Weber’s ancient research, Protestant Calvinists — who in most cases imagine within the concept of “predestination,” or that God has selected some folks to be stored and others damned — felt the want to justify their very own sense of themselves because the stored. They appeared each for outward indicators of God’s choose (i.e., thru subject matter luck) and for methods to specific inward distinctive feature (i.e., thru laborious paintings). Whilst the accuracy of Weber’s research continues to be debated through students, it however tells us so much about cultural attitudes on the time Weber wrote it.
Via 1905, no less than, the concept operating laborious and receiving subject matter, monetary praise for that paintings was once integral to a definite strand of Protestant Christianity had entered the general public awareness. Consistent with a fresh Dutch learn about, that perspective nonetheless holds true as of late: Protestants and voters of predominately Protestant nations have a tendency to conflate hard work with private pleasure greater than the ones of different non secular traditions.
A last strand of the improvement of the prosperity gospel was once the improvement of charismatic Pentecostal church buildings in The us. An umbrella time period for a decentralized staff of church buildings — comprising over 700 denominations — Pentecostal church buildings are characterised through an emphasis on what’s referred to as “religious presents” (or charisms, from which the time period “charismatic” is drawn). A worshipful Christian would possibly revel in, for instance, the present of therapeutic, or would possibly all of sudden get started talking “in tongues.” This practice of worship supposed that, for a believer, the concept God would manifest Himself to the devoted in concrete, miraculous techniques within the right here and now was once extra prevalent than it could be in, say, a mainline Episcopalian church. As well as, the decentralized nature of those church buildings additionally supposed that particular leaders, a lot of whom practiced religion therapeutic or an identical practices, had a in particular sturdy impact on their congregations and may just building up person private followings.
Those 3 strands collided during the 20th century, because the prosperity gospel got here into being. It began — just like the “paintings ethic” Max Weber described — so to justify why, right through the Gilded Age, some folks had been wealthy and others deficient. (One early prosperity gospel proponent, Baptist preacher Russell H. Conwell, instructed his mostly-destitute congregation in 1915: “I say you would like to be wealthy; you haven’t any proper to be deficient.”) As an alternative of blaming structural inequality, Conwell and the ones like him blamed the perceived disasters of the person.
All the way through the 20th century, proponents of this in particular American mix of theology envisaged God as a type of banker, meting out cash to the deserving, with Jesus as a style trade govt. Either one of those characterizations had been, now and then, literal: In 1936, New Concept mystic and founding father of the Team spirit Church Charles Fillmore rewrote Psalm 23 to learn, “The Lord is my banker/my credit score is just right”; in 1925, promoting govt Bruce Bowler wrote The Guy No one Is aware of to argue that Jesus was once the primary nice capitalist. The literal cash quote reads, “Some day … anyone will write a e-book about Jesus. Each businessman will learn it and ship it to his companions and his salesmen. For it’s going to inform the tale of the founder of recent trade.”
But it was once in Pentecostal church buildings — with their focal point on fast religious presents and the ability of God to confer choose (and wellness) straight away — that the prosperity gospel as we realize it as of late took cling. The “Phrase of Religion” motion — a Pentecostal model of New Concept that noticed fine confirmation as central to monetary and subject matter luck — turned into extra outstanding. Figures like Kenneth Hagin, his protégé Kenneth Copeland, Oral Roberts, and, after all, Osteen himself constructed up person followings: followings that incessantly grew on account of cross-promotion (one thing non secular historian Kate Bowler issues out in her very good Blessed, a historical past of the prosperity gospel motion). One preacher would possibly, for instance, function some other at his convention, or hawk his cassette tapes.
Central to the prosperity gospel was once the theory of tithing, or giving cash to the church, preferably one’s “first end result” — or preliminary profits. This cash, many prosperity gospel preachers promised, was once an funding. Via appearing religion, parishioners may have a “hundredfold” go back on their funding, a connection with a verse within the Gospel of Mark about those that endure for Christ receiving a hundredfold what they’ve misplaced. Thus may just Ken Copeland write in his Rules of Prosperity, “Do you need a hundredfold go back in your cash? Give and let God multiply it again to you. No financial institution on the planet provides this sort of go back! Reward the Lord!” On this mentality, tithing is a financially accountable factor to do. It’s a display of religion and a shrewd funding alike, a bet on the concept God acts within the right here and now to praise the ones with each religion and a sufficiently evolved paintings ethic.
The prosperity gospel tended to ebb and go with the flow based on wider cultural traits — it flourished within the postwar increase of the Fifties, and however (unsurprisingly) within the no much less ostentatious ‘80s, when large hair and large cash alike had been in. But in spite of the catastrophic fall of one of the maximum outstanding proponents of the gospel — Jim Bakker, for instance, spent years in jail for fraud — the motion has continued smartly into the prevailing day. In all probability no much less unsurprisingly, two of its main proponents — Paula White and Wayne T. Jackson — had been a few of the six religion leaders invited to wish with Donald Trump at his inauguration.
Unquestionably Trump is, in some sense, a made from that mentality. In a fresh op-ed in The New York Occasions, theology professor Anthea Butler argued that Donald Trump and Joel Osteen had been “mirrors” of each other:
Each revel in monumental toughen amongst evangelicals, but they lack a command of biblical scripture. Each are a few of the 1 p.c … Mr. Trump’s and Mr. Osteen’s manufacturers are rooted in luck, now not Scripture. Believers in prosperity like winners. Hurricanes and catastrophic floods don’t give you the successful narratives an important to stay adherents chained to prosperity gospel considering. For this reason it’s simple for each males to factor platitudes devoid of empathy right through herbal failures.
It’s tough to mention that the prosperity gospel itself ended in Donald Trump’s inauguration. Once more, simplest 17 p.c of American Christians establish with it explicitly. It’s way more true, on the other hand, to mention that the similar cultural forces that ended in the prosperity gospel’s proliferation in The us — individualism, an affinity for ostentatious and charismatic leaders, the Protestant paintings ethic, and a cultural obsession with the ability of “fine considering” — form how we, as a country, method politics.
What’s our collective way to well being care, in any case, if now not rooted in a visceral sense that the unfortunate are chargeable for their very own misfortune? What’s our willingness to vote a person like Trump into administrative center however a collective cultural praise for individuals who emblem themselves as a hit?
In any case, Trump will have embraced New Concept greater than someone learned: seeing himself within the White Area, asserting himself within the White Area, sooner than someone else noticed it coming.
He’s gotten his funding again a hundredfold.
Will you toughen Vox’s explanatory journalism?
Tens of millions flip to Vox to grasp what’s taking place within the information. Our project hasn’t ever been extra important than it’s on this second: to empower thru working out. Monetary contributions from our readers are a important a part of supporting our resource-intensive paintings and assist us stay our journalism unfastened for all. Please believe creating a contribution to Vox as of late.
Know how coverage affects folks. Delivered Fridays.
Test your inbox for a welcome electronic mail.

supply